skim: update to 5.5.0#61569
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SPSVerYRaFEhpnE7AFndwJ
|
packages need to be tested in Void. additionally, please read https://github.com/void-linux/.github/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#ai-usage |
|
I disabled the integration tests only, because they rely on nextest for retries and zellij for the harness. I'm not able to wire that in properly myself. Sorry about the non-disclosed AI usage, this is totally on me. However, the usage was minimal : all Claude did was bump the version, nothing more, I just didn't want to waste a CI run on a later update and I was away from my computer. The rest is all me, without any AI usage at all, including choosing which tests to run. @classabbyamp could you please treat this as my disclosure and reopen this ? |
|
why did you need to use an LLM to change a version number and run AI usage is not allowed regardless of disclosure |
|
CONTRIBUTING.md says AI usage must be disclosed, nothing about it being forbidden. The changes originate from me and I understand them. Sorry if I'm not clear. I pushed a new version of skim and didn't update this PR before shutting down my computer. When I realized I could update this PR using claude, I did it to save my time and avoid an extra CI run on void-packages' side. |
it's the first line of the policy |
|
The contribution was made by me, using a tool. I don't think you'd forbid me from using my shell, text editor or any other tool that would make editing text easier for me, or consider that as the tool contributing to the project. I don't use void myself, and I'm only doing this because the package looks unmaintained after no updates for nearly a year, including major versions, and I care about my work reaching users. |
Testing the changes
Local build testing